Case 1404366/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G May-Clingo v O'Neill And Brennan Construction Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404366/2020
- Decision date
- 9 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G May-Clingo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment only. The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 28 January 2021 it gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 21 November 2020 and 14 December 2020, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Dawson struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with tribunal orders dated 21 November 2020 and 14 December 2020 and for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.