Case 1404369/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms C Stevens, HR — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404369/2023
- Decision date
- 11 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Lewis Pearman was employed by Car-Wizard Limited as a mobile smart repair technician from 14 February 2023 to 24 July 2023. His final payslip dated 31 July 2023 showed gross pay of £6,419.25, normal PAYE and national insurance deductions, and further “voluntary deductions” of £3,806.70, reducing his net pay to £962.77. The claimant brought a monetary claim for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of that £3,806.70.
The respondent relied on clause 13 of a service agreement, which stated that certain costs for vehicle damage and other services could be deducted from the employee’s pay. It said the deductions covered van repairs, replacement parts, customer complaint-related commission adjustments, and a deep clean, and that the total calculated deductions were £4,449.51, although the amount actually taken was limited to £3,806.70. The claimant’s evidence was that he never signed the service agreement and did not agree to its terms.
The tribunal accepted the claimant’s account on the balance of probabilities. It found that the respondent produced no documents supporting its case on presentation or acceptance of the service agreement, and the respondent’s witness, Mr Oliver Birrel, was not present to be questioned. The tribunal found that the service agreement, and in particular clause 13, had never been agreed by the claimant.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the deduction from the claimant’s final salary was unauthorised within section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and upheld the claim. It ordered Car-Wizard Limited to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,806.70.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant never agreed to clause 13 of the proposed service agreement, so the deduction from his final salary was unauthorised under section 13 ERA 1996. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £3,807 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,807
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.