Case 1404382/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Huddlestone v Plantabox Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404382/2018
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Huddlestone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 13 January 2020, the tribunal gave Miss C Huddlestone an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concerns were that she had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 10 July 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no findings on the substantive merits and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying pleaded cause or causes of action in the extracted text; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for failure to comply with tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.