Case 1404400/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Langdon v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404400/2022
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Halliday Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Langdon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claimant's application for interim relief at Plymouth by CVP on 13 January 2023. The application was made under sections 161 and 163 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Employment Judge Halliday refused the application for interim relief. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested in time.
By agreement, the respondent's name was amended to Royal Mail Group Limited.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment refused the claimant's application for interim relief under sections 161 and 163 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It does not determine the substantive underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 161 and 163 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.