Case 1404406/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Dr C Mallon v MZA Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404406/2021
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Noons
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr Stanley, Mr Palmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr C Mallon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham Employment Tribunal, heard via CVP on 20 and 21 July 2023, the tribunal unanimously decided that Dr C Mallon's claim for disability discrimination against MZA Ltd failed and was dismissed. The written record identifies the claim and outcome but does not set out substantive findings or a written reasoning section.
The judgment records that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the standard note on reasons. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records a unanimous dismissal of the disability discrimination claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons are included in the record unless separately requested. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.