Case 1404411/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Moore v Swan Lane Engineering Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404411/2021
- Decision date
- 6 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mrs D England, Mr C Williams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol hybrid hearing on 6 to 10 March 2023, the tribunal found that Mr S Moore was not disabled at the material time by reason of anxiety and depression. It also found that Swan Lane Engineering Limited did not have actual or constructive knowledge that he was disabled at the material time, although the respondent admitted that he was disabled by reason of his stroke and hole in the heart.
The claim for constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed. The claims for direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability were also dismissed. The published record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.