Case 1404418/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Richards v Greenpost Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404418/2020
- Decision date
- 1 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Richards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that Mrs J Richards had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Greenpost Ltd to pay damages of £656.80. The judgment does not set out any wider remedy analysis beyond that notice award.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £788.16. The judgment adds a calculation note stating that the claimant had 4 continuous years of employment and that redundancy was calculated as 1.5 x 4 x 131.36, producing the figure awarded.
Finally, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £131.36. No discrimination claims or other liability issues are recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no separate award breakdown beyond the three stated sums is given.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £657 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. The judgment notes this was calculated on 4 continuous years of employment. | Upheld | — | £788 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages and ordered payment of this sum. | Upheld | — | £131 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,576
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.