Case 1404423/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Gunes v AND No 21 Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404423/2021
- Decision date
- 7 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Gunes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 21 March 2022 and entered judgment under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The judgment records that the claimant was Mr N Gunes and the respondent was No 21 Group Limited.
The claimant’s claim for breach of contract succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay eight weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £3,388.00.
The claimant also succeeded on his claim for unlawful deduction from wages, and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £2,596.15. A further claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded, with an order for payment of the gross sum of £449.65.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded eight weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £3,388.00. | Upheld | — | £3,388 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,596.15. | Upheld | — | £2,596 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of accrued but unpaid holiday pay in the gross sum of £449.65. | Upheld | — | £450 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,434
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.