Case 1404424/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Griffiths v No. 21 Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404424/2021
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 16 November 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Livesey determined the claim, or part of it, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 8 July 2022 was cancelled.
On the merits recorded in the judgment, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,008.40. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,031.12.
The judgment does not separate any further heads of loss. The total amount awarded on the face of the judgment is £2,039.52.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £1,008.40. | Upheld | — | £1,008 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,031.12. | Upheld | — | £1,031 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,040
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.