Case 1404427/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Hongsopha v No. 21 Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404427/2021
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Hongsopha
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 16 November 2021. The judgment records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim, or part of it, under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that No. 21 Group Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,405.70. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £919.51.
The hearing listed for 8 July 2022 was cancelled. The judgment was sent to the parties on 25 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £2,406 |
| Holiday pay | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £920 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,325
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.