Case 1404430/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Carol Taylor v Stockbridge MGT Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404430/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Carol Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal identified the correct respondent as Stockbridge MGT Limited and heard the case at Bristol on 2 December 2022 before Employment Judge Lang. The judgment records that the claimant, Mrs Carol Taylor, represented herself and the respondent was represented in person by its director.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. It ordered the respondent to pay £800, described as the gross sum owed to the claimant. No other claims or additional remedy components are recorded in the written judgment.
Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £800, described as the gross sum owed pursuant to the Working Time Regulations 1998 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.