Case 1404434/2020 · Employment Tribunal

1) Mr S Musatoiu 2) Mrs N Musatoiu v Mig100 Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 1404434/2020
Decision date: 8 April 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Millard Representation
Venue: Remote Video Hearing

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

1) Mr S Musatoiu 2) Mrs N Musatoiu

Respondent

Mig100 Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a remote video hearing on 31 March 2021, Employment Judge Millard considered preliminary limitation issues in cases 1404434/2020 and 1404385/2020. The claimants attended and the respondent did not attend.

For both Mr S Musatoiu and Mrs N Musatoiu, the tribunal recorded that each claim had been presented out of time. It nevertheless found that it was not reasonably practicable for either claim to have been presented in time, and that each was presented within a reasonable further time period. The written record is a preliminary judgment only and does not record any substantive merits decision or monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Preliminary judgment on limitation only. The tribunal found the claim was presented out of time but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was presented within a reasonable further time period.	Upheld	—	—
Other	Preliminary judgment on limitation only. The tribunal found the claim was presented out of time but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was presented within a reasonable further time period.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.