Case 1404439/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Cheney v The Outside Chance Public House Ltd (in Voluntary Creditors Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404439/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harper MBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Cheney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge R Harper MBE determined the claim on the papers. The respondent was The Outside Chance Public House Ltd (in Voluntary Creditors Liquidation). The judgment records that the claimant, Mr M Cheney, succeeded on all matters decided.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,196.40 gross. It also found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,196.40 gross.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,938.00 gross. The judgment does not separate any broader compensatory award or interest; the recorded sums are the individual gross awards and the total follows from those three amounts.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages ordered for breach of contract in respect of notice; amount stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £1,196 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment; amount stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £1,196 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement; amount stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £1,938 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,331
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.