Case 1404458/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Piech v International Food Bath Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404458/2021
- Decision date
- 1 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Piech
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 18 November 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal recorded that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £881.98. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £192.28.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £323.03. The total sum awarded by the judgment was £1,397.29, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 1 June 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £882 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states this was in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £192 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £323 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,397
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.