Case 1404460/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Heidi Louise Morgan t/a Curae Home Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404460/2019
- Decision date
- 12 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 12 March 2020 and proceeded under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The judgment identifies the claimant as Michelle Giles and the respondent as Heidi Louise Morgan trading as Curae Home Care.
The claimant’s sole claim was for unlawful deduction from wages. That claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £453.34.
No separate findings, legal tests, or additional remedies are recorded in the judgment beyond the Rule 21 judgment and the gross award. The decision is signed by Employment Judge N J Roper and dated 12 March 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeds and orders payment of the gross sum of £453.34 under Rule 21 because no valid response was presented. | Upheld | — | £453 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £453
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.