Case 1404478/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Daum v Mr J Fletcher — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404478/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Daum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Daum's claims succeeded in part. The tribunal awarded £76.80 for unpaid notice pay, £39.60 for unpaid holiday pay, and £540.00 for unlawful deductions from wages, making a total award of £656.40. The judgment record does not set out separate written findings beyond the disposal and the monetary awards, and it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed. No discrimination or other protected-characteristic issue is identified in the judgment record. The written record is a short rule 61 judgment and does not record any further legal analysis or separate apportionment of the award beyond the three sums listed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded in respect of unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | £77 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded in respect of unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £40 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded in respect of unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £540 |
| Other | The Respondent's counterclaim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £656
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.