Case 1404506/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Williams v LJP Store And Post Office Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404506/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs H Williams brought claims against LJP Store And Post Office Ltd for non-payment of redundancy pay, breach of contract in respect of notice pay, unpaid annual leave, unfair dismissal, failure to provide a written pay statement, and discrimination on the prohibited grounds of pregnancy or maternity. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew the redundancy pay, notice pay, and unpaid annual leave claims, and those claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The respondent did not present a response to the claims. Under Rule 21, the tribunal recorded that the remaining claims succeeded: unfair dismissal, failure to provide a written pay statement, and unlawful discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy or maternity. The decision states that the remedy for the successful claims would be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing listed for two hours and to be conducted remotely by CVP.
This decision does not contain any final monetary award, and it does not set out separate remedy figures for the successful claims. The written record is dated 19 March 2021 and was sent to the parties on 6 April 2021.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claimant withdrew the non-payment of redundancy pay claim; it was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid annual leave was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the respondent failed to present a response and found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written pay statement. The judgment does not use a taxonomy category for this claim, so it is recorded as other. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal found unlawful discrimination on the prohibited grounds of pregnancy or maternity. The judgment does not specify any separate remedy for this claim in this decision. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.