Case 1404506/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hughes v J D Wetherspoon plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404506/2021
- Decision date
- 1 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hughes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's complaint of discrimination on the grounds of disability. In a letter dated 24 March 2022, the tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the complaint should not be struck out.
The stated reasons were that the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 24 March 2022. The judgment records that the claimant either failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing, so the complaint was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of discrimination on the grounds of disability was struck out because the Tribunal considered it had no reasonable prospect of success and the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 24 March 2022. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.