Case 1404541/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Ashton v Cafeteria la Crowns Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404541/2020
- Decision date
- 22 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Ashton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 10 June 2021, the Tribunal gave Cafeteria la Crowns Limited an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why its response should not be struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The judgment therefore states that the response is struck out. The decision records that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any further hearings and decisions, but may participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. No substantive liability findings or monetary award are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the respondent's response because the respondent did not comply with Tribunal orders and had not actively pursued the response. No substantive claim determination or remedy is recorded in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.