Case 1404550/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R MacLeavy v Bestway Panacea Holdings Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404550/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R MacLeavy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a short written judgment at Bristol on 3 September 2020, Employment Judge Livesey recorded that the claimant's complaints of direct discrimination and breach of contract, as identified in paragraphs 20.1.2 and 23 of the Case Management Summary of 30 March 2020, were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The judgment also states that the balance of the claim would proceed in accordance with the Summary and Order of even date. The written record contains no findings on the merits or remedy. It notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers to a complaint of direct discrimination, but the extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic. It was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint identified in paragraph 23 of the Case Management Summary of 30 March 2020. It was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.