Mr A Deburgh v Kier Recycling CIC — 2020

Case reference: 1404556/2019
Decision date: 22 June 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Midgley Bristol

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Deburgh

Respondent

Kier Recycling CIC

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By order dated 29 May 2020, Employment Judge Midgley ordered the claimant to pay a deposit to continue pursuing his claims of constructive unfair dismissal and accrued but untaken annual leave against Kier Recycling CIC. The deposit sums were required by 12 June 2020.

The claimant did not pay the deposit sums as ordered. The judgment records that the claims were therefore struck out and dismissed. No substantive findings on liability were made, and the listed hearing for 23 June 2020 was vacated.

The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested. No monetary award was made.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	By order dated 29 May 2020, the claimant was ordered to pay a deposit to continue this claim. The deposit was not paid by 12 June 2020, and the claim was struck out and dismissed.	Struck out	—	—
Holiday pay	The judgment refers to a claim for accrued but untaken annual leave. A deposit order was made on 29 May 2020, the deposit was not paid by 12 June 2020, and the claim was struck out and dismissed.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.