Case 1404589/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Dumont v Saint-Gobain Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404589/2021
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Halliday Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Dumont
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr M Dumont had been constructively unfairly dismissed by Saint-Gobain Limited. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The short Rule 21 judgment does not record any further reasoning, split award, or monetary remedy for the dismissal claim in the extracted text.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's breach of contract claims succeeded in relation to unpaid bonus and company sick pay. No sum is stated in the extracted text for either head of loss, and no further breakdown of remedy is given in the judgment extract provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed and that the unfair dismissal claim succeeds. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's claims for breach of contract in relation to unpaid bonus and company sick pay succeed. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.