Case 1404602/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person assisted by Ms Biden (friend) v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404602/2021
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person assisted by Ms Biden (friend)
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Smail in Exeter by video on 12 October 2022. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had been employed by the First Respondent, alternatively the Third Respondent, between 17 January 2019 and 8 December 2021, when she resigned claiming constructive dismissal. It also recorded that the early conciliation certificates covered all the claims sought to be brought, and that any earlier non-acceptance was set aside by consent.
The claims against the Second Respondent in her individual capacity were withdrawn, and she ceased to be a respondent. The judgment states that allegations remained in relation to her only for the purpose of any vicarious liability claim against the First, alternatively the Third Respondent. The tribunal found that the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at any material time. On that basis, the disability discrimination claim was dismissed.
The judgment did not determine the remaining substantive claims, and it directed that case management for those claims would be dealt with in a separate document of the same date. No monetary remedy was awarded or assessed in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at any material time, so the disability discrimination claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Equality Act 2010 disability definition
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.