Mr M Scovell v Glen Untulis — 2019

Case reference: 1404613/2019
Decision date: 2 December 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge R. Harper MBE

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Scovell

Respondent

Glen Untulis

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dealt only with the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It found that Mr M Scovell had been employed by Glen Untulis for less than two years, so he did not satisfy the service requirement in section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for bringing an unfair dismissal claim.

The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but he did not provide an acceptable reason. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.

The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision, so no determination was made on those matters in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under s.108 ERA 1996; the claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but did not give an acceptable reason.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.