Case 1404617/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Cole & Mrs L Mosley v Ellen Comms UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404617/2021
- Decision date
- 29 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Cole & Mrs L Mosley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 10 December 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Midgley Date determined the claims under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
For Mr R Cole, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £270.00 gross. It also found that his holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered payment of £259.00. The total payable to Mr Cole was £529.00.
For Mrs L Mosley, the tribunal made the same finding on unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £270.00 gross. It further found that her holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered payment of £235.00. The total payable to Mrs Mosley was £505.00. The combined amount ordered was £1,034.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant (R. Cole). The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £270.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £270 |
| Holiday pay | First claimant (R. Cole). The tribunal found holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered payment of £259.00. | Upheld | — | £259 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant (L. Mosley). The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £270.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £270 |
| Holiday pay | Second claimant (L. Mosley). The tribunal found holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered payment of £235.00. | Upheld | — | £235 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,034
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.