Case 1404626/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Moore Ms S Taylor Ms R Paxton Mr J F Hall v Oasis Dental Care Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404626/2020
- Decision date
- 10 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr N Moore Ms S Taylor Ms R Paxton Mr J F Hall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 June 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concerns were that the claimant had not complied with the Case Management Orders dated 26 September and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim.
The judgment also records that the hearings listed for 21 August 2023 and 16 to 23 October 2023 would not take place. No substantive merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s); it states that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter of 30 June 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.