Case 1404639/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr W Evans (2) Mr R O’Connor (3) Miss C Hazell (4) Mr J Elshaw v Dean Eric Newton — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404639/2021
- Decision date
- 18 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr W Evans (2) Mr R O’Connor (3) Miss C Hazell (4) Mr J Elshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claims under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. It therefore made a determination on the papers and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr W Evans: the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £790.00. | Upheld | — | £790 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr R O'Connor: the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,430.00. | Upheld | — | £1,430 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr J Elshaw: the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,039.67. | Upheld | — | £1,040 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,260
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.