Case 1404666/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Ashley Rhodes v David Roberts t/a The Brunel Inn — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404666/2020
- Decision date
- 9 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Ashley Rhodes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 1 March 2022, the tribunal noted that the respondent, David Roberts t/a The Brunel Inn, was an undischarged bankrupt. On that basis, the proceedings were stayed pursuant to section 285(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the claimant's employment claims. Instead, it recorded that the proceedings would be dismissed on 30 June 2022 without further order unless the stay was lifted before then. Written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was recorded within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment did not adjudicate the underlying claims. It recorded that the respondent was an undischarged bankrupt, stayed the proceedings under section 285(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986, and stated that the proceedings would be dismissed on 30 June 2022 unless the stay was lifted before then. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.285(2) Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.