Case 1404712/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Sutherland v Crystal Clear Designs and Signs Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404712/2021
- Decision date
- 12 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Sutherland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge David Hughes at Bristol by CVP on 28 March 2023. The written judgment states only one operative finding: the parties did not reach an agreement that the claimant's employment with the respondent would end on 31 August 2021 or 1 September 2021.
No further findings on liability, remedy, or the substantive tribunal claims are set out in the extracted text. The record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
On the face of the written record, the tribunal decided a discrete preliminary issue about whether there had been an agreement to end employment on the specified dates. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing judgment only recorded the tribunal's finding that the parties did not reach an agreement that the claimant's employment would end on 31.08.2021 or 01.09.2021. No substantive liability claim was determined in the text provided. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.