Case 1404736/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Tymkow v Blencowe Scaffolding Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404736/2020
- Decision date
- 21 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Tymkow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Bristol by video on 4 June 2021 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. The Claimant, Mr G Tymkow, appeared in person and the Respondent, Blencowe Scaffolding Limited, was represented by Mr P Maratos, a litigation executive.
The tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s breach of contract claim in respect of notice. It held that claim failed and made no award on that head.
The tribunal upheld the monetary claims for unlawful deductions from wages and arrears of holiday pay. Those sums were recorded as agreed: £307.68 for unlawful deductions and £346.16 for holiday pay, making a total award of £653.84.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim in respect of notice failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded unlawful deductions from wages in the agreed sum of £307.68. | Upheld | — | £308 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found arrears of holiday pay were due in the agreed sum of £346.16. | Upheld | — | £346 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £654
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.