Case 1404745/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Hares v The Southern Co-Operative Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404745/2019
- Decision date
- 7 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Hares
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 7 May 2020, Employment Judge Midgley Date gave a rule 52 judgment dismissing the claimant's complaints of unlawful deductions from wages, holiday pay, and direct disability discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment states that these complaints were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The decision does not contain merits findings on those complaints or any monetary award. It records that the claimant's remaining claim(s) would proceed to hearing on 9 to 11 November 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52; no separate remedy recorded in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52; no separate remedy recorded in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no separate remedy recorded in this judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.