Case 1404751/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Crowhurst v Marchwood Engineering Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404751/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Crowhurst
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. It held that the claimant’s claim for notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay and other payments succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £1,746.97. That total comprised £191.08 for an unlawful 20% deduction from the claimant’s March 2020 pay, £406.88 for 47.7 hours of accrued but unpaid holiday at £8.53 per hour, £153.60 for unlawful deduction of overtime paid at time and a half, £40.00 for unlawful deduction of bonus pay calculated at £40 per month, and £955.41 for one month’s basic pay as notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld for a 20% deduction from March 2020 pay (£191.08), overtime paid at time and a half (£153.60), and bonus pay calculated at £40 per month (£40.00). | Upheld | — | £385 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld for 47.7 hours of holiday accrued but unpaid on termination, paid at £8.53 per hour. | Upheld | — | £407 |
| Other | Notice pay awarded at one month’s basic pay; the judgment does not use a more specific legal label. | Upheld | — | £955 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,747
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.