Case 1404758/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jack Goodall v AND El Rico’s Coffee House Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404758/2021
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jack Goodall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in chambers on 21 March 2022 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 in favour of Mr Jack Goodall against El Rico’s Coffee House Limited. It found that the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded and that his claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded.
For the unlawful deduction from wages claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £462.00. For the accrued but unpaid holiday pay claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £99.00. The judgment also records that the claimant gave credit of £120.00 already received against the above sums, leaving a net amount payable of £441.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 21; respondent did not present a valid response. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £462.00 on this claim. | Upheld | — | £462 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment under Rule 21; respondent did not present a valid response. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £99.00 on this claim. | Upheld | — | £99 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £441
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.