Case 1404771/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Hammond v Morley Trading Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404771/2021
- Decision date
- 21 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Hammond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 20 December 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the material finding recorded in the judgment, the tribunal held that Morley Trading Group Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr D Hammond’s wages. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,115.63 gross.
The listed hearing on 30 September 2022 was cancelled following the rule 21 determination. No separate remedy breakdown beyond the wage award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The claim was determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,116 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,116
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.