Case 1404773/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Romano v AND JP Hotel Ventures Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404773/2021
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Romano
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 21 March 2022 and dealt with the claim under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The claimant was Mr N Romano and the respondent was JP Hotel Ventures Limited.
The claimant’s breach of contract claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay one month’s notice pay in the net sum of £3,348.38.
The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of accrued holiday pay for 2020 in the gross sum of £6,462.00 and accrued holiday pay for 2021 in the gross sum of £5,400.00, making a total holiday pay award of £11,862.00. Judgment was sent to the parties on 6 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded one month’s notice pay in the net sum of £3,348.38. | Upheld | — | £3,348 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded accrued but unpaid holiday pay of £6,462.00 gross for 2020 and £5,400.00 gross for 2021, making £11,862.00 in total. | Upheld | — | £11,862 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,210
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.