Case 1404791/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Evans v Sentinel Group Security Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404791/2021
- Decision date
- 31 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol by VHS on 29 June 2022 before Employment Judge Midgley, with Mr J Evans appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Lomas, lay representative. The written record states that the claims were dismissed.
The tribunal's reason was procedural rather than substantive. It found that the claims had not been presented in time and that it was reasonably practicable for them to have been presented within the applicable time limit. On that basis, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims.
The judgment record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. An amended judgment was sent to the parties on 31 October 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claim because it was not presented in time and it found it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented within time, so it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.