Case 1404804/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Katrina Ling v Musgrave Ventures Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404804/2021
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Katrina Ling
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Katrina Ling, brought a claim against Musgrave Ventures Ltd concerning deductions from pay. At the hearing, the parties did not have identical documentation, the Claimant had no witness statement, and the Respondent's statement had only been supplied that morning and was not received by the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted that some facts were not in dispute, including that there had been deductions, some of which had been refunded, and that gross pay was not in dispute apart from an enhancement that had not been credited for some hours worked.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the Respondent was ordered to pay £750 gross in respect of deductions from pay. The judgment records that the Respondent accepted £335.35 was due and that the Claimant's figure was £1,088.76; the dispute included the length of notice required during probation and whether an enhancement should have been credited for some hours worked. | Settled | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.