Case 1404808/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Miles v Anupe Dha — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404808/2021
- Decision date
- 13 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Miles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Miles brought claims against Anupe Dha in the Bristol Employment Tribunals. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Dawson Date determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on 13 September 2022. The hearing listed for 30 September 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £35.64 net. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £806.35 net. The judgment records a total net award of £841.99.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Award stated net. | Upheld | — | £36 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Award stated net. | Upheld | — | £806 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £842
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.