Case 1404828/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cook v The County Tyre Group — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404828/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr J Cook’s complaint of discrimination on the grounds of disability. It recorded that by a letter dated 21 May 2021 the Tribunal had stated that unless the claimant complied with the direction of 11 February 2021, that complaint would be struck out.
The reason given was that the claimant had failed to respond to the Tribunal’s letters and directions of 11 February and 28 April 2021 without explanation, and had also failed to respond to the respondent’s application dated 14 May 2021. The Tribunal further found that he had failed to make representations in writing, or had failed to make any sufficient representations, in relation to the unless order of 21 May 2021.
The judgment records only that the disability discrimination complaint was struck out. It also states that the claimant’s remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 7 July 2021, so no substantive determination is made in this judgment on any other claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant’s complaint of discrimination on the grounds of disability was struck out after he failed to comply with the Tribunal’s directions and unless order, and failed to respond to the Tribunal’s letters, directions, and the respondent’s application. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.