Case 1404829/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Dennis v Dignity Funerals Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404829/2020
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Dennis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at first noted that, by letter dated 11 November 2021, it had given Mrs T Dennis an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The respondent was Dignity Funerals Ltd. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Cadney on 30 November 2021 and sent to the parties on 16 December 2021.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. No substantive findings were recorded on the merits of any underlying complaint, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out because the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's 11 November 2021 letter about the claim not having been actively pursued. The substantive nature of the underlying claim is not identified in the reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.