Case 1404838/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404838/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms E Smillie, Mr K J Sleeth
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place in chambers at Exeter on 9 May 2023 before Employment Judge N J Roper with lay members Ms E Smillie and Mr K J Sleeth. The claimant did not attend and was represented by no one; the respondent was represented by Ms S Hornblower of Counsel.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had a long history of non-compliance with Tribunal orders and of failing to attend agreed hearings, both during his employment and in the conduct of the proceedings. The case had been presented on 22 December 2021, and the length and venue of the hearing had previously been agreed at a case management hearing on 24 August 2022.
The claimant had been the subject of applications for strike out and/or unless orders because of repeated non-compliance. He failed to attend a third case management hearing on 24 April 2023 and then made repeated applications for postponement on 24 and 26 April and 1 and 3 May 2023. The reasons given included difficulty obtaining time off work, disagreement with the previously agreed venue, inability to comply with directions, and illness. Those applications were refused.
The tribunal noted that the claimant made clear that if a postponement was not granted he would withdraw his claim, and he also confirmed by email that he did not intend to attend the hearing. The unanimous judgment was that, having considered all information made available to it and in the claimant's absence, the claimant's claim was dismissed pursuant to Rule 47.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing. The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive issues. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.