Case 1404853/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Ebsworth v Securewest International Limited (In Voluntary Creditors Liquidation) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404853/2021
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Matthews Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs S Ebsworth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Ebsworth's claims against Casson International were dismissed on withdrawal, and her claims for a redundancy payment, notice pay, arrears of pay and other payments were also dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal then dealt with her unfair dismissal claim and a contractual holiday pay claim against Securewest International Limited.
The tribunal found that Mrs Ebsworth was unfairly dismissed because Securewest failed to consult. It found that, on the papers and evidence available, had consultation taken place the dismissal would have been by reason of redundancy, would have taken place within the notice period, and would have been fair. The tribunal noted that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply, and that Mrs Ebsworth had already been paid a sum equal to her notice pay by the Redundancy Payments Service, so no basic award was made.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded no unfair dismissal compensation beyond the interest Mrs Ebsworth incurred on a £3,000 loan she took out to meet living expenses. That amount was £1,885.60. It also upheld her contractual holiday pay claim under article 6 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, finding she was owed three days' pay at a net rate of £85.27, totalling £255.81.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed unfairly because Securewest failed to consult; compensation was limited to the interest on a £3,000 loan and no basic award was made. | Upheld | — | £1,886 |
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Arrears of pay and other payments dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Contractual holiday pay difference awarded as damages under article 6 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. | Upheld | — | £256 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,141
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,886
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.