Case 1404889/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Ndoj Mr S Hathaway v Exhibit-Uk.net Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1404889/2018
- Decision date
- 28 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Ndoj Mr S Hathaway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a strike-out judgment under rule 37. By a letter dated 15 March 2019, it gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why their claims should not be struck out because they had not responded to the Tribunal's letter of 8 March 2019 and the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations in writing or request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims, and the hearing listed for 13-14 May 2019 did not take place. The judgment was sent to the parties on 28 March 2019, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Case 1404889/2018 was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's letters dated 8 March 2019 and 15 March 2019 or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Case 1404890/2018 was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's letters dated 8 March 2019 and 15 March 2019 or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.