Case 1404890/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person (assisted by Miss Schafer the Claimant’s daughter) For the v Mr Goldup (Consultant) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404890/2021
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (assisted by Miss Schafer the Claimant’s daughter) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by consent, the Claimant's claim for £501.22 net in unpaid wages for July, August and September 2021 succeeded, and the Respondent was ordered to pay that sum. It also recorded that, by consent, the Claimant's claim for £2,395 gross for accrued but untaken holiday pay succeeded, with an order for payment of that amount.
The judgment further states that the parties agreed terms to settle all remaining claims. Those remaining claims were dismissed on withdrawal, and the settlement terms were confidential and therefore not included in the judgment. The text does not identify those remaining claims individually.
The written record was sent to the parties on 30 August 2022, following an oral judgment given at the hearing on 15 August 2022. No written reasons were provided in the record itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal recorded unpaid wages for July, August and September 2021 and ordered the Respondent to pay £501.22 net. | Upheld | — | £501 |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the tribunal recorded accrued but untaken holiday pay and ordered the Respondent to pay £2,395 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,395 |
| Other | The judgment says the parties agreed terms to settle all remaining claims, which were dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining claims are not individually identified in the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,896
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.