Case 1404952/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Searles v Castleman Accident Repair and Service Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404952/2020
- Decision date
- 26 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Searles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Dawson Date ordered Castleman Accident Repair & Service Limited to pay Mr C Searles £1,450.10 for an unauthorised deduction from wages, £329 for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, and £571.20 for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The judgment also records an award of £5,199.47 for injury to feelings. No separate interest award, basic award, or compensatory award is stated in the extracted text. The total amount ordered by the judgment is £7,549.77.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,450 |
| Breach of contract | The award is for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £329 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £571 |
| Disability discrimination | The extracted text records an award for injury to feelings but does not restate the underlying liability finding. | Upheld | Disability | £5,199 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,550
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.