Case 1404977/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Anderson v DCS (Food Ingredients) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404977/2023
- Decision date
- 1 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leverton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Leverton sat alone at Bristol by CVP on 7 June 2024. The respondent did not appear or have representation. The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages, finding that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the period 3rd-21st July 2023 and ordering repayment of the gross sum deducted, £1,533, with the claimant responsible for tax and National Insurance.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to give the claimant a written itemised pay statement for July 2023 when payment was due, as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. It recorded that the respondent had made unnotified deductions from the claimant's pay in the 13 weeks before the claim form was presented and awarded £184.12 in respect of those deductions.
Finally, the tribunal found that when the proceedings were begun the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. It held that there were no exceptional circumstances making an award equivalent to two weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable, and that it was not just and equitable to award four weeks' gross pay. It therefore awarded £1,286 under section 38 Employment Act 2002. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment was £3,003.12.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 3rd-21st July 2023 and ordered repayment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,533 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give a written itemised pay statement for July 2023 at the time payment was due under section 8 ERA 1996, and awarded £184.12 in respect of unnotified deductions from pay in the 13 weeks before the claim was presented. | Upheld | — | £184 |
| Other | At the time proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The tribunal found no exceptional circumstances making two weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable, and said four weeks' gross pay was not just and equitable, so it awarded £1,286 under section 38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,286 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,003
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.