Case 1404997/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Vallence v Butters Cafe Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1404997/2018
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Vallence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 October 2019, the Tribunal gave Mr F Vallence an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his claim should not be struck out. The warning was based on two matters: he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 12 September 2019, and the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Vallence did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. Employment Judge Roper signed the judgment on 29 October 2019 and it was sent to the parties on 1 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the warning letter. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the warning letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.