Case 1405011/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Lanni v Hampshire Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1405011/2020
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray’s Order
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Lanni
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the Claimant’s disability discrimination allegations covering the period from 2015 to 2020. The judgment says those complaints concerned the Respondent’s alleged failure to follow its own procedures and policies, as set out in Employment Judge Gray’s Order of 23 September 2022.
The reason given was procedural rather than substantive: the Claimant did not pay the deposit order made on 28 September 2022 within the time allowed, as extended. The tribunal therefore struck out those complaints under rule 39(4). The judgment also records that the remaining complaints proceed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination allegations said to arise from 2015 to 2020 were struck out after the Claimant failed to pay the deposit ordered on 28 September 2022 within the time specified, as extended. The judgment states that the remaining complaints proceed. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.