Case 1405046/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Farrow v Overland Boat Movements Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1405046/2023
- Decision date
- 12 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Farrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 26 August 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,100.00 gross. It also ordered payment of £724.10 to cover outstanding expenses. The judgment does not break those sums down further or identify any separate award for costs or interest.
The tribunal made no separate award in respect of items of lost or retained property. It recorded that it had no jurisdiction to deal with issues relating to interference with goods, so that part of the claim did not result in a monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £2,100.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
| Other | The tribunal ordered £724.10 to cover outstanding expenses; the judgment does not label this head of claim separately. | Upheld | — | £724 |
| Other | No separate award was made for items of lost/retained property because the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to deal with interference with goods. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,824
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.