Case 1405048/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Munro v Millennium Engineering Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1405048/2023
- Decision date
- 29 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bradford Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Munro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr W Munro was unfairly dismissed by Millennium Engineering Limited and that his wrongful dismissal claim for notice pay was well founded. The written judgment records the liability conclusions and then sets out the remedy calculation.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded 12 weeks' notice pay at £695 per week, producing £8,340 for wrongful dismissal. For unfair dismissal it calculated a basic award of £12,538.50 and then reduced that figure by 10% for conduct under s122(2), resulting in £11,284.65.
The compensatory award was £2,635. The tribunal included £650 for loss of statutory rights, £65 as an ACAS uplift, and £1,920 for the absence of a written statement of particulars. It recorded that past financial loss and pension loss were offset by earnings after dismissal, so past financial loss was reduced to £0. The tribunal also noted that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply because the claimant had not received recoverable benefits. The overall total awarded was £22,259.65.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award reduced by 10% for conduct under s122(2). Compensatory award included £650 for loss of statutory rights, £65 ACAS uplift and £1,920 for no written statement of particulars; past financial loss and pension loss were reduced to £0 after earnings. | Upheld | — | £13,920 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded 12 weeks' notice pay at £695 per week. | Upheld | — | £8,340 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,260
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £11,285
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,635
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.